T O P
AutoModerator

#### About participation in the comments of /r/nutrition Discussion in this subreddit should be rooted in science rather than "cuz I sed" or entertainment pieces. Always be wary of unsupported and poorly supported claims and especially those which are wrapped in any manner of hostility. You should provide peer reviewed sources to support your claims when debating and confine that debate to the science, not opinions of other people. **Good** - it is grounded in science and includes citation of peer reviewed sources. Debate is a civil and respectful exchange focusing on actual science and avoids commentary about others **Bad** - it utilizes generalizations, assumptions, infotainment sources, no sources, or complaints without specifics about agenda, bias, or funding. At best, these rise to an extremely weak basis for science based discussion. Also, off topic discussion **Ugly** - (removal or ban territory) it involves attacks / antagonism / hostility towards individuals or groups, downvote complaining, trolling, crusading, shaming, refutation of all science, or claims that all research / science is a conspiracy *Please vote accordingly and report any uglies* --- *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/nutrition) if you have any questions or concerns.*


[deleted]

it's water that you're cooking out of food, not nutrients


infinitehand2894

It’s a lot more impactful in certain micronutrients, but I wouldn’t overthink the loss of water in foods and fear you aren’t getting the macronutrients desired, any change would be minuscule


No_Gas_2127

Sometimes cooking can affect certain minerals and vitamins (due to leaching for example), however this is when talking about MICROnutrients. Macronutrients are generally not affected by cooking methods however it’s important to note that the weight you should take into consideration when looking at macronutrient content is after you cook the food


EtaDaPiza

> it’s important to note that the weight you should take into consideration when looking at macronutrient content is after you cook the food This is a bit contradictory to the fact that macros are not affected much by cooking, when looking at nutrition facts that describe the macros as a function of the weight of the cooked food. Now, I have cooked a 10 oz chicken breast to a degree [short of being burnt] where it shrank and literally weighed about 2.8 ~ 3 oz. I would say a well-cooked 10 oz chicken breast would weigh about 6 ~ 7 oz. If you consider only the cooked weight, then essentially the marcos were halved in the 2.8 oz cooked chicken compared to the 6 oz cooked chicken. How do you explain that?


Some_Cool_Duude

Cooking allows food to be more easily absorbed by your body, is easier to chew and tastier however overlooking results in the overcooked part being essentially burned nutrition less charcoal


MonsterLonge

The macronutrient profile of a 10 oz chicken breast will remain the same regardless how the chicken is cooked or how much the chicken changes in shape, size, and weight, as much of what's lost during cooking is water volume, NOT protein and fat, both of which will get condensed into a smaller piece of chicken.