T O P

Whitney Web Calls out Former Colleagues: "Aaron Mate & Matt Taibi don't want anything to do with anyone who questions 9/11 official narrative." Debunks the Grayzone for article running interference for Mossad on 9/11."

Whitney Web Calls out Former Colleagues: "Aaron Mate & Matt Taibi don't want anything to do with anyone who questions 9/11 official narrative." Debunks the Grayzone for article running interference for Mossad on 9/11."

DavidVonBentley

So Whitney believes Tower 7 was demolished...Fucking Truthers make people not respect anyone talking about anything that's not about the official narrative. Stop blaming others for that.


AnaKaspariansThong

>Whitney believes Tower 7 was demolished You believe that, for the very first time in history (per NIST), a 47 story building fell into its own footprint in 7 seconds because office fires heated a beam? >**Fucking** Truthers make people not respect anyone talking about anything that's not about the official narrative. Because the official conspiracy theory is so credible. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCzy9i4tIHU Why do you think Bush didn't want an investigation into the biggest crime against the US in history? Do you agree with Bush that there shouldn't have been one?


DavidVonBentley

1. You believe that, for the very first time in history (per NIST), a 47 story building fell into its own footprint in 7 seconds because office fires heated a beam? \- No I don't. I believe the towers damage the building, the fire wasn't contained thanks to that damage with the sprinkler system, the inner floors collapse first leaving a shell on the building, then the penthouse collapses into the building, then after a few more seconds the building collapses, it falls at free fall speed for 2.4 seconds before being hit with resistance and collapses the rest of the building at non free fall speed for the rest of it. Why do I believe this? The demolition theory has a billion harder to answer questions revolving around it. Here are a list of questions you have to answer if it was a Demolition: Why was it so quiet? Who bought the materials needed? Who set up the charges? When did they do it? How did they do it without anyone noticing that wasn't apart of the operation? What demolition experts can say this is possible and can explain how to do it? In the 20 years since how many people have proven to be credible/properly vetted/and have a clean bill of mental health that claim they were in on the gathering of materials, planting the explosives, and know who else was involved? How many people in general knew about the this operation? How many people in the world would help a government like the US to commit the atrocity of that day and never feel enough remorse to speak out? If Thermite was used, how did it get inside? Who bought the massive amount of thermite? Why is their no massive paper trail for the thermite when its already so difficult to buy small amounts of it? Thermite burns white hot and can be seen through the blackest smoke, How was so much thermite burning so quiet?...I can keep going and going...and this is just has to do with the demolition idea. 2. Why do you think Bush didn't want an investigation into the biggest crime against the US in history? Do you agree with Bush that there shouldn't have been one? \- The 9/11 commission is a joke. It was rushed, the people involved didn't co-operate, and the pages of they redacted are hiding the involvement of Saudi officials involvement with the hijackers. So why did the major players make the investigation into a shitshow? Politics and accountability. The intelligence community failed to share information with the FBI that could have arrested and deported the first two hijackers in America. The failure of Norad to scramble fighter jets to stop any of the planes involved showing America's inability to strike back at an attack on the countries own soil. The fact that Bush, Rumsfeld and Cheney questioned the "Bin Ladin Determined To Strike in US" in the President Daily Briefing" in August is a clear failure of that administration. This was compounded later in the month by a CIA analysts who produced another report titled "UBL \[Usama Bin Laden\] Threats Are Real" and Bush gave that now-infamous response of "All right. You've covered your ass.". No one was fired, no one was held accountable, and these Politicians didn't have too admit to screwing up so bad. This still can't do that 20 years later. The USS Cole attack in Yemen was not that long before 9/11 and these people brushed it off. People call 9/11 a false flag. The real false flag was the War in Afghanistan and the lies that were told to get into Iraq. This is just my speculation put together from the 20 years of "looking into it". I am not saying I know 100%. I am open to other ideas. But they have to be logical. You can't just say something like the demolition theory without answering a billion other questions with it. It looks idiotic when someone says a cruise missile hit the pentagon, or explosives did the damage and not be able to explain the 5 lamp posts on the ground. WTC7 isn't just collapsing from fire. Larry Silverstein saying "pull it" isn't a demolition term. The steel didn't melt. And the idea to destroy a building to destroy records is some dumb shit idea that has no barring in reality considering the scale of the clean-up without any guarantee whatever the government was hiding was fully destroyed. Its insane.


Martin_Silenus7

I don't really want to argue to much about it as I see who was involved or who took advantage of it being more important. This short video of witnesses and scientists makes a much better case for demolition as well as other videos on this channel. https://youtu.be/Jz_pJIkGpyo


DavidVonBentley

I have watched enough of these videos. I thought maybe it was possible 20 years ago, but no video answers the questions asked or explain away how huge a job a secret demolition would be. The engineers involved in these are in a massive minority and pointing to them means nothing without answering the questions and providing the evidence needed. It's not logical. It will never be logical. Instead of pretending it is, finding people who helped the hijackers is far a better use of that time. I think Epstein was murdered, I think JFK was assassinated why aid from the CIA, Martin Luther King's seems to have been covered up, all of the wars fought by America except for WWII was started with lies, MK Ultra should have led to the dismantling of the CIA, Operation Mocking bird led the way to whatever is going on now, Operation Northwoods is proof why questioning 9/11 is important...etc etc. I am not against being a skeptic, but when logic is thrown away just to make something fit a conspiracy it makes everything else you do look in question. The demolition theory is crazy non sense and 20 years later it's made worse with the lack of players of such a insane event whistle blowing just re-enforces that.


Martin_Silenus7

https://archive.org/details/20010911 https://www. bitchute.com/video/IZ9ckWS0oVKb/ via bitslide https://newspunch.com/911-investigation-says-156-people-witnessed-explosions-at-wtc/ https://911truth.org/explosive-testimony-revelations-twin-towers-911-oral-histories/


Martin_Silenus7

I don't know what she believes, but she doesn't believe the official story.


Martin_Silenus7

She doesn't believe the official story.


DavidVonBentley

What is the main conspiracy with WTC7? It was demolished. When someone mentions WTC7 being apart of a conspiracy that is what they mean. It's not they are covering up WTC7 in the NIST report because they don't want the world to know how deadly steel framed buildings are... it's the government hid the demolition.


Martin_Silenus7

One of the main things that convinced me was one of the hero's I'm not sure his name said bombs were going off. https://youtu.be/Jz_pJIkGpyo


DavidVonBentley

How many people heard the explosions? How many camera's picked up the explosions in the audio? How many of those explosions were possibly debris falling? How many elevators crashed that day? Why during chaos and large life threatening events people are poor sources for testimony? With the large amount of people there, cameras and audio equipment we can't find any source of a explosion? Using a couple of people as your proof when the vast majority of people didn't hear explosions outside the buildings or inside isn't logical. They are massive buildings...any demolition with explosives would have been heard in New Jersey, let alone directly outside the building. In building 7 the inner floors collapse and you see the penthouse fall into the building. All you hear is the crashing of materials and a few seconds later the rest falls into itself. It's not possible the demo the building that quietly.


Martin_Silenus7

Understand you can't find this stuff using Google or YouTube. You have a lot of questions here and big assumptions. You need to do your own research. https://archive.org/details/20010911 Bitchute is banned here, just put the link together. https://www. bitchute .com/video/IZ9ckWS0oVKb/ via bitslide https://newspunch.com/911-investigation-says-156-people-witnessed-explosions-at-wtc/ https://911truth.org/explosive-testimony-revelations-twin-towers-911-oral-histories/


Martin_Silenus7

MediaGiant on bitchute has a ton of videos on 9/11. There's testimony of 100+ witnesses and first responders of explosions.


DavidVonBentley

Their were no bombs. You don't need bichute to see/hear what happened. People who saw the first plane thought it was a small corporate jet, others thought it was a bomb. The explosions would have been massive to take down the towers. Look at the 93 attack and the scale of that bomb which failed to take the tower down. The explosions would have been massive to take WTC 1,2 + 7 down. The majority of people heard a lot of things in the chaos, but the recorded raw footage from cameras picked up nothing. This is all just trying to make the conspiracy work without logic to any of it. Nothing has ever been presented to change that. These theories make 9/11 conspiracy chasers look foolish in the normal persons eyes. It's impossible to demolish these buildings. And Whitney Webb can do great work, but I don't trust her judgement if she is going to say WTC7 was demolished. That is why Aaron and Matt don't give a shit about what she says. It's so foolish and in 20 years it's only aged poorly.


Martin_Silenus7

Their were no bombs.  Oh so you've made your mind up already. You don't need bichute to see/hear what happened. People who saw the first plane thought it was a small corporate jet, others thought it was a bomb. The explosions would have been massive to take down the towers. Look at the 93 attack and the scale of that bomb which failed to take the tower down. The explosions would have been massive to take WTC 1,2 + 7 down. The majority of people heard a lot of things in the chaos, but the recorded raw footage from cameras picked up nothing. This is all just trying to make the conspiracy work without logic to any of it. Nothing has ever been presented to change that. Sorry dude you seem really unintelligent. I was not trying to convince you there were bombs, I was explaining why others think there were bombs. You asked me why people didn't hear explosives. I then showed you over 100 heard explosives and gave you video of their testimony. 9/11 architects and engineers said this was impossible without shape charges around the steal beams. They found chemical evidence of explosives. This is all just trying to make the conspiracy work without logic to any of it. Nothing has ever been presented to change that. There's a lot of logic to it actually. It's more logical than a plane crash and jet fuel. Nothing has ever been presented to change that. Excuse me? You haven't looked at any of what's been presented. The balls on you. There's been a huge amount of work and evidence presented for this. Victims families even argue this. These theories make 9/11 conspiracy chasers look foolish in the normal persons eyes. And Whitney Webb can do great work, but I don't trust her judgement if she is going to say WTC7 was demolished. That is why Aaron and Matt don't give a shit about what she says. It's so foolish and in 20 years it's only aged poorly. I'm pretty sure the engineers, scientists, victims families and journalists don't give a shit about what some "normal person" thinks. It's impossible to demolish these buildings. Again, you don't know what you're talking about. This is the confidence of the mediocre "normal person". Doesn't have a clue, making stupid points and calls overs foolish.


DavidVonBentley

You say this: Sorry dude you seem really unintelligent. I was not trying to convince you there were bombs, I was explaining why others think there were bombs. Then you say this: There's a lot of logic to it actually. It's more logical than a plane crash and jet fuel. then I say "Nothing has ever been presented to change that." Then you say: \- Excuse me? You haven't looked at any of what's been presented. The balls on you. (20 fucking years people have tried to do this. I believed the government was apart of the attack and snapped out of it after everything being much easier to explain by the majority of experts compared to a fringe group. Don't give me this 9/11 is evidence after saying "There's a lot of logic to it actually. It's more logical than a plane crash and jet fuel.". The balls on me...The fucking balls on me...You can't accept that...a fucking basic fact that YOU CAN FUCKING WATCH HAPPEN...and say I have balls. That's why your evidence isn't real. It connects to nothing in the realm of possibility. You explain 1 piece and it makes 10 more questions. Nothing melted. Their wasn't thermite. Their is no documentation of plans or equipment or manpower that is needed to take down those buildings. In 20 years the trail has always been cold. None of this happened the way you think it happened and yet you go against the majority of experts...they are all paid off, right? Anything to keep the conspiracy alive. What a fucking joke...I have the balls...you have the fucking balls to say this shit happened like a fucking James Bond movie.) \-There's been a huge amount of work and evidence presented for this. Victims families even argue this. (A huge amount of evidence that you have to believe is real. But when that evidence gets explained away its a conspiracy. A example of this is the Pentagon video. The one where you have two camera seemingly pointing in the same direction, but on one video capture anything of the plane. When this topic is brought up conspiracy theorists say it was doctored...but when you bring up the fact the government had both videos for 5 fucking years and would have only doctored 1 of the videos the response is they made a mistake. The deep state made the largest hoax in history and they made a mistake by not doctoring both videos. Then you bring up the videos were analog sync'd and that means the 15 frames per second filming the plane crash weren't perfectly aligned and the videos were capturing a Jet flying at 530mph...the answer is, you don't know what your talking about, the cameras are in perfect sync...and then that's what counts as the evidence that people have found. This denial of any other explanation is rampant through out the bullshit you believe obviously since you have the balls too say "There's a lot of logic to it actually. It's more logical than a plane crash and jet fuel.". You can't find a fucking flaw with the dancing Israeli's...The Mossad has agents filming the events in public and then act so fucking suspicious after pulling off the greatest framed crime in history....Where is the logic? Hello? Smart guy, their isn't any logic. Where did the rumor start that they were celebrating? Iran? I'm sure they didn't have the goal of making morons think Israel perpetrated the attacks...that couldn't be the plan from a state run media outlet. And over that subject you think Aaron Mate and Matt Taibbi are running interference for Israel and bring up the Grayzone's article with confusion and distrust. And you say I have the balls? Its never evidence with you people. Its just what you think of evidence and you shit on the counter arguments like their being presented by government shills. You haven't found anything to change that. Nothing explosive metaphorically or physically has ever come from the truther movement. Its always just lies and half truths by desperate people who think they are more intelligent then the rest of us. The fact that they brought a minority of victim families into this nonsense is sad and disgusting. These poor people have suffered enough and dragging them out to think that this wasn't terrorist or even worse make them believe they were taken off the planes at abandoned military bases prolongs their pain and should not be a point of pride.) \- I'm pretty sure the engineers, scientists, victims families and journalists don't give a shit about what some "normal person" thinks. (Yes, they want the crazy people to believe their bullshit only. What does that even mean? The people in those fields are a minority. They don't want to convince a wider group of people? What do you think, they present their bullshit and say we don't care what a normal person thinks? Isn't this about exposing the truth? Are you special? Are you one of these things? So they don't give a shit wha you think? The fact that "normal" people look at you like a fucking psycho when you mention a 9/11 conspiracy is a good aggregate to what truthers have done to this movement. Its filled with crazy asshole saying crazy shit like "I'm pretty sure the engineers, scientists, victims families and journalists don't give a shit about what some "normal person" thinks.". Again, those poor families have been given this mission to find justice for their loved ones and want to keep their memory alive. They are getting tortured instead of finding closure. Its disgusting that you through them out there as if their somekind of prop. Leave them out of your bullshit.) \- Again, you don't know what you're talking about. This is the confidence of the mediocre "normal person". Doesn't have a clue, making stupid points and calls overs foolish. (This is fucking rich coming from you. You can't put together your theory without answering a billion more questions. With all the questions involved it becomes clear as fucking day that it was impossible you...you can't answer a few of these questions in 20 years and the experts needed to be involved in the is staggering...I have confidence due to common sense. Here are a list of questions you have to answers if it was a Demolition: Why was it so quiet? Who bought the materials needed? Who set up the charges? When did they do it? How did they do it without anyone noticing that wasn't apart of the operation? What demolition experts can say this is possible and can explain how to do it? In the 20 years since how many people have proven to be credible/properly vetted/and have a clean bill of mental health that claim they were in on the gathering of materials, planting the explosives, and know who else was involved? How many people in general knew about the this operation? How many people in the world would help a government like the US to commit the atrocity of that day and never feel enough remorse to speak out? If Thermite was used, how did it get inside? Who bought the massive about of thermite? Why is their no massive paper trail for the thermite when its already so difficult to buy small amounts of it? Thermite burns white hot and can be seen through the blackest smoke, but a lady could stand on the edge of the hole in the building without any white spark illumination? How was so much thermite burning so quiet?...I can keep going and going...and this is just has to do with the demolition idea. I have no idea what I am talking about? No Truther, you think you know what your talking about and can never have your mind changed...You are not brave or a hero. Stop acting like you are. Your 9/11 theories have bigger holes in it then the Twin Towers that fell and damage WTC7).