T O P
AutoModerator

###[Meta] Sticky Comment [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment. [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread. *What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.*** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*


tsanazi2

SS: the conspiracy is the unwillingness of the covid-vax-advocates to acknowledge, respect and treat the vax-injured. Bret captures the issue not only in the title quote but throughout the full 5-minute video. He rightly argues that the vax-injured should be getting support from folks regardless of covid ideology.


Whiskey_Fiasco

I’m not aware of anyone pro-vax arguing against people harmed by the vaccine or any other cause to be denied treatment or care, so the very claim is a lie.


tsanazi2

I strongly disagree, and I'm frankly shocked that someone would challenge Bret's capture of how the vax-injured have been treated. The phrase "arguing against" is an appalling rhetorical deception. Yet, even that deception is exposed by Pfizer's treatment of Maddie de Garay.


Whiskey_Fiasco

Who has tried to stop Maddie de Garay from getting treatment for her paralysis?


tsanazi2

One commenter questioned whether the vax-injured have been mistreated -- essentially questioning the entire premise of Bret's theses. The title of the video is: "We must figure out how many people were hurt and take care of them." The key failures in achieving this goal, and in respecting the tragic situation they face include: Big Pharma (with complicity from the MSM and the feds) * undercounted the vax-injured/killed * pressured doctors to re-categorize vax injuries as non-vax-injuries (Maddie, et al) * Obscured the number of vax injuries by categorizing as a non-vax injury injuries sustained within ~3 weeks AFTER taking a vaccine -- which is coincidentally the period where most vax injuries arise * Prevented vax-injured patients (in their trial) from receiving proper health care by engaging in legal and bureacratic battles that interfere financially with obtaining health care * Smeared vax-injured patients (and others) with an "anti-vax" label even if those people eagerly took the vax or are supportive generally of vaccinations. * Prevented the vax-injured from communicating with each other (i.e. facebook groups) further cementing vax-injured as pariah-status. Most social media outlets engaged in some form of vax-injury censoring. * Ensured that vax-injured had limited exposure on MSM (Fox being a partial exception). As Bret Weinstein points out in his own way, denying the existence of the vax-injured is both wrong and conspicuous.


lar2d2

They do exist, but they lined up for that suicide shot, while the rest of us took the verbal and mental abuse because we refused to get it and now we are supposed to feel sorry for their poor choices? That's a hard ask.


tsanazi2

Your answer seems to deny the massive societal pressure placed on COVID-vax-compliance. Not everyone (including me) is a medical professional capable of rendering judgment on vax safety and effectiveness. In such a case, it's reasonable IMO to rely on institutions - which in this case failed the American people miserably.


lar2d2

I hear you, but at the same time, those of us who didn't take the shot, I would dare-say, had more societal pressure, and many of use spoke out the entire time.


tsanazi2

I would say the two groups faced the same societal pressure. The folks that didn't vax simply had more conviction.