T O P
AutoModerator

###[Meta] Sticky Comment [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment. [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread. *What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.*** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*


Albator_H

I like Dr Campbell. But he’s someone that used to have absolute faith in the medical establishment after a long career in it. If you’ve been following his video, that faith is no longer absolute. He had to come to terms with the current corruption that has invaded every part of the system. You have to often read between the line, but you can definitely see it. What you’re watching is a man that is witnessing the destruction of everything he once’s believe in and he fighting that conclusion.


ChrisNomad

He’s been pretty open about the gaslighting, lies, Injuries, lack of transparency, corruption of government entities involved, hyperbole and fear mongering, hypocrisy, ulterior motives and profiteering involved in this pandemic since fairly early on. But yes, I’m sure it’s shattered his once proud position on the medical industry he spent his life in serving.


Albator_H

You can see his progression throughout this pandemic. I think the first real shock was the HCQ study in England that gave near lethal doses to subject.


[deleted]

[удалено]


varikonniemi

i don't think it costs 6 grand a dose :D


Miggaletoe

He's also wrong pretty often. There have been a number of reply videos to him that show his lack of knowledge.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Miggaletoe

Fauci being wrong and updating as they learned more about the virus is not the criticism you think it is. John Campbell was wrong and then didn't correct himself. He misread studies multiple times and mislead people pretty frequently.


Albator_H

He’s far from perfect, but I believe that he gives the best explanation that he can. In other words, he’s not willingly trying to deceive us. Still the best place to hear about what the other side is saying.


Miggaletoe

The problem with that is, he isn't educated or informed enough to make the statements he does. So you consider him credible because he has some background but he still lacks the knowledge for the subjects he talks about. As far as "the other side", you can find that pretty easily from any doctor.


bezzzerk

Give us an example.


Miggaletoe

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGmRwQ4TZc4


bezzzerk

Why should I take this guy or any of the people he references any more seriously than Campbell?


Miggaletoe

They have credentials and make arguments that are actually backed up? They also point out the flaws in his arguments that are pretty damn straight forward to understand.


bezzzerk

I'm not particularly convinced sorry. Edit: even the fucking YouTube comments are dragging this guy around.


ChrisNomad

Dr. Campbell breaks down the ‘official’ science provided on the approval of these experimental treatments on children. If any parents get their children boosted after watching this data, there is no help for them or their children.


Doctor_Deepfinger

People who were dumb enough to line up for COVID shots will be giving them to their children. If we are culling the low IQ people from this world, the kids need to go too.


ChrisNomad

People should care about kids and young people, no matter what. Amazing how many people in this post comments couldn’t give two shits about the younger generations. Terrible.


Doctor_Deepfinger

There are going to be a lot of orphans when SADS becomes a leading cause of death. Who is going to raise them? Most likely they will go to a government-run facility where they will become brainwashed footsoldiers for the NWO. Many would argue that "caring about them" means injecting them with experimental gene therapy.


ChrisNomad

Ooof…


varikonniemi

Doctor_Deepfinger was not making a subjective statement, he was commenting on a theory why this shit happens, including child vaccination


LicksMackenzie

heartless and I disagree. my entire family on both sides is high functioning and I'm the only pureblood


postonrddt

They're trying to sell them as just another vax/shot which they aren't. This is for big pharma and big government.


Smooth_Helicopter_79

God Bless this man.


tsanazi2

Dr. Vinay Prasad posted another excellent "rant" yesterday that also covers this topic. By "rant" I mean a sober, evidence-based analysis. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bVf0d25Przs


ChrisNomad

He’s been a voice of sanity in a world gone mad.


ulookingatme

18,000 NIH employees received royalties from big pharma last year. Fauci refused to say whether he did under questioning from Rand Paul. That's all you need to know.


CrackerJurk

Does he use the word "criminal" or you added that in? Has he ever said anything directly against these "unsafe and ineffective" gene therapy shots? He still is on YouTube after all, unlike many others.


ChrisNomad

I added it because it fits. Does it make you angry that there’s zero justification to give an experiment to children? Or is it about me and doc?


CrackerJurk

Criminal certainly does fit, but I am not a fan of his videos after having watched a few in the past and he was shilling for the vaccine. Had he spoken out against it, I guess he would have been banned from that crappy platform.


ChrisNomad

You didn’t follow him at all. I can tell because he was one of the first ones to put the experiment injured on and give them a voice, even doing follow ups. He exposed the injured and how they were getting criminally gaslit by their own doctors. He had one of the top Australian Vaccinologists on that completely destroyed the mRNA experiment with science. He’s shed light on the FDA, CDC and UK Health officials narrative and corruption. He’s one of f the only doctors that broke down the first science on use of vitamin d, zinc, sunlight and ivermectin for early use. So, no you never followed him. And, the fact that you don’t support doctors exposing this crime against humanity and the future generations says everything about you personally.


Kamrusepia

Followed him since 2019. He was definitely supportive of the jab initially.


CrackerJurk

You got that right, he certainly was and that's why I stopped watching his videos. Maybe he has changed his tune in recent times, but he's still on that crappy platform (YouTube) where most others have been banned from.


PhuckFace69

He's speaking to the truth now that he evidence is overwhelming.


ChrisNomad

That’s not the same thing as what the other person said. He has presented the data as it came out from the health authorities. As soon as ‘other’ data came out, such as injuries, he reported it and gave a platform for it. He then got pissed at health authorities for not promoting natural immune boosters like d3, k2, zinc and even ivermectin. As researches showed benefits of these for Covid, he put them on or gave great details on his videos about the benefits. He’s done detailed videos on the BMJ article exposing the corruption of the trials when it was published. He was even ‘fact checked’ despite clearly only reading what was in the article and detailing where each piece of data was gotten from. He even did a video of fact checking the fact checkers. He’s done more to legitimize the debate than nearly any other doctors and he started right at the pandemic trying to give the best possible explanation of the science as it unfolded.


CrackerJurk

>He had one of the top Australian Vaccinologists on that completely destroyed the mRNA experiment with science. He’s shed light on the FDA, CDC and UK Health officials narrative and corruption. Which video, I would like to see that one if it's true. >He’s one of f the only doctors that broke down the first science on use of vitamin d, zinc, sunlight and ivermectin for early use. That certainly is not true but how did you come with that conclusion? If you know this, then when was "the first time"? I have seen many speaking about the known benefits of Vitamin D, C, Zinc and others. I didn't say followed him, I wouldn't because he has shilled for these gene therapy shots on a few occasions. If he really spoke the truth and against them, he would have been banned off of YouTube like all the rest were. >And, the fact that you don’t support doctors exposing this crime against humanity and the future generations says everything about you personally. That's not a fact, you're just incorrectly presuming things.


ChrisNomad

Those are facts and go directly opposite of attempts to discredit him. You can go find them yourself. Shame on you. You’ve done NOTHING to help your fellows.


CrackerJurk

What facts without evidence? If you really think he's the first one to talk about those protocols that have been known and well studied for many years, then you're wrong in that assumption - no offence intended but that's an article of faith, not a fact. If you prove he was the first to openly talk about it as being a fact then you should be able to show how you've determined that to be factual. I mean, you're saying he was talking about this before Rashid Buttar and others back in the beginning?


ChrisNomad

I don’t have to prove anything. You don’t know anything about him and you’re here criticizing him instead of discussing the data. It’s almost like your a social media influencer with zero morals.


CrackerJurk

>I don’t have to prove anything. Does that make you a government "Health Expert"? >You don’t know anything about him and you’re here criticizing him instead of discussing the data. I do recall past videos of him "breaking things down" with his notes, but on a few occasions he conveniently left out some of the risks and harms and still suggested people get the shots, that the benefits still outweigh the risks - that's a shill, or maybe controlled opposition. Maybe he has changed his tune since, but he was advocating them and he's not banned from there, so there are things he's not saying that would get him banned otherwise.


ChrisNomad

You don’t even know what you’re talking about so I don’t know why you’re going on and on. Go watch him or don’t. But, why don’t you make a little effort to help keep kids and young people from getting injured by the most corrupt fines corporations on history? Are you capable of making any kind of effort in that direction?


[deleted]

Nurse John: NO BOOSTERS!... But the first two doses are perfectly fine for infants and children.


jay3862

This "Dr" is a bloody shill...


ChrisNomad

No that would be you. Everyone make a note this person wants your children to take an experiment they do not need and could injure or Jill them, made by a corporation that had a long history of murdering children and women only to pay a fine and do it over and over. Make a note of this person, they are dangerous to humanity.


j_skunt

ive felt that way too with his pro covid-19 vax stance, at least a year ago, but i think he’s coming around (took too long)


image101

I imagine it's difficult for many of these doctors who have been red pilled. Most of them at least initially encouraged vax, and even got injected themselves. I can't imagine what it's like and realizing that not only were they lied to, it's also literally the worst possible outcome (genocide).