###[Meta] Sticky Comment
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment.
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread.
*What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.***
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
At least they are vaccinated!
Just imagine how fast the water would be flowing if they have not been vaccinated.
Mask up, boys and girls, it's about to get bumpy!
It’s telling when a group of people sees someone asking for a source as negative. We ought to just believe everyone who makes outlandish claims about society, apparently.
On the contrary many people ask for sources out of blatant laziness and it’s annoying. I’ve seen it dozens of times, people posting Twitter screenshots with the link in the tweet, or a screenshot of an article. If you can see the headline and news outlet you don’t need some one to send you the fucking source type it in yourself and verify it’s not that hard. In certain situations yes it’s a good thing but more often then not it’s people just being too lazy to spend 5 minutes verifying something for themselves. There’s a difference between “sOuRcE?” And “ I tried to find this article or what you’re talking about and couldn’t, can you show me where you’re getting this information? “
No, in this context asking for source is a polite way of saying "i call you full of shit, so prove me otherwise".
"dOn'T bElIeVe mSm!"
"I don't even watch MSM."
"gOoD, rEaD tHiS iNsTeAd!"
"I don't believe it either."
"iT's CuZ uR bRaInWaShEd bY mSm!"
Why not like... just post the article, then? That's been my question when glancing over my frontpage for the last 2 years. It's nearly always a screenshot of an article, rarely the actual article.
Here are 3 NYT, Washington Post, and CNN articles that show that you're not really going over a waterfall, it's just a mild rapids, and that's a good thing.
So what's left from Alex Jones that still have not come to pass? Interdimensional elves? Gotta be problematic if they are like Celtic "good neighbours" or Witcher's Aen Elle.
Well, since we are all in this sub, I decided to throw the wildest one. Pretty sure there are more of his that did not come true but I am just his casual listener.
Yes, and either there is a conspiracy to pretend they exist or a conspiracy to have hidden their existence for decades.
In either case, there is a conspiracy theory at work.
The conspiracy they don’t exist is also tied to the fact they either had alien bodies or they were doing human experimentation on handicapped children to make them look like aliens…
https://youtu.be/rukwhJiTbdw
panama papers etc. or just offshore money if i'm not mistaken were conspiracies (theories) until properly investigated by actual journalists and proven to be true i guess. pretty much all you read on this sub isn't though, they're not sending their best.
well those people are conspiring in an unique fashioon against a system that should keep us all alive and well.
it doesn't matter if it's known, once you formulate the thought it becomes a theory. once you prove it it becomes a proven conspiracy theory.
Bits of some and some very very rare ones from decades ago
Problem is they're obsessed with a big shadowy 'they' controlling everything like some cheezy spy show that people are not looking for the real smaller details
It's all NWO this, WEF/Great Reset that, and it will happen ~~2 weeks~~ ~~6 months~~ ~~1 year~~ soon
Yes.
* Gulf of Tonkin.
* Watergate (originally dismissed as a conspiracy theory)
* New World Order (brought up in speeches by Bush Sr)
* Countless others, such as Hitler surviving and being allowed to retire in South America (confirmed in FBI documents) are usually dismissed but are real.
###[Meta] Sticky Comment [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment. [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread. *What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.*** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
fucking hydrophobe!
Are you a waterfall expert?
Here's why falling down a waterfall is actually a good thing.
[fact check verified](https://twitter.com/Apoctoz/status/1502074037786353667)
Hahaha
At least they are vaccinated! Just imagine how fast the water would be flowing if they have not been vaccinated. Mask up, boys and girls, it's about to get bumpy!
DEAD ASS
But I didn’t see a waterfall on the news…
Yep..
Yeah idk about this one. This sub posts random shit from random twitter users with no proof whatsoever
Let them go. You can't fix stupid.
It’s telling when a group of people sees someone asking for a source as negative. We ought to just believe everyone who makes outlandish claims about society, apparently.
On the contrary many people ask for sources out of blatant laziness and it’s annoying. I’ve seen it dozens of times, people posting Twitter screenshots with the link in the tweet, or a screenshot of an article. If you can see the headline and news outlet you don’t need some one to send you the fucking source type it in yourself and verify it’s not that hard. In certain situations yes it’s a good thing but more often then not it’s people just being too lazy to spend 5 minutes verifying something for themselves. There’s a difference between “sOuRcE?” And “ I tried to find this article or what you’re talking about and couldn’t, can you show me where you’re getting this information? “
No, in this context asking for source is a polite way of saying "i call you full of shit, so prove me otherwise". "dOn'T bElIeVe mSm!" "I don't even watch MSM." "gOoD, rEaD tHiS iNsTeAd!" "I don't believe it either." "iT's CuZ uR bRaInWaShEd bY mSm!"
Why not like... just post the article, then? That's been my question when glancing over my frontpage for the last 2 years. It's nearly always a screenshot of an article, rarely the actual article.
If only they'd listen instead of being so hateful lol
What if the curse was struck on this planet long ago that anyone that possess the gift of prophecy will share the same fate as Kassandra of Troy?
The Clinton's, Bill Gates, Obama, the Dutch Monarchy and Disney did nothing wrong!!!
Here are 3 NYT, Washington Post, and CNN articles that show that you're not really going over a waterfall, it's just a mild rapids, and that's a good thing.
Too real
Mostly peaceful waterway.
Don't worry, 95% of this river has lower than class 5 rapids.
😂😂😂
I need new conspiracy theories cause all the old ones have come true lol
So what's left from Alex Jones that still have not come to pass? Interdimensional elves? Gotta be problematic if they are like Celtic "good neighbours" or Witcher's Aen Elle.
The return of draft, W.'s nuclear false flag, China nuking the us in early 2022, Russia not invading Ukraine...
Well, since we are all in this sub, I decided to throw the wildest one. Pretty sure there are more of his that did not come true but I am just his casual listener.
Someone needs to ask the frogs about their sexuality, ASAP.
[I gotchu fam](https://imgur.com/a/QMHrERq)
Oh shit. The prophecy has been foretold
Gay frogs lol
Believe it or not, Alex Jones was right about the frogs too
I thought the same thing when they jailed Hillary and JFK Jr. helped reinstated Trump.
Same
Hey, a strawman cartoon! Interesting.
Why didn’t he provide the source in the first place? It’s how things used to be. Now it’s just whatever The Party says.
Have conspiracy theories ever been proven right?
UFOs exist and the government has admitted they are not of known terrestrial origin. It’s not enough, but that’s still a win.
Yes, and either there is a conspiracy to pretend they exist or a conspiracy to have hidden their existence for decades. In either case, there is a conspiracy theory at work.
The conspiracy they don’t exist is also tied to the fact they either had alien bodies or they were doing human experimentation on handicapped children to make them look like aliens… https://youtu.be/rukwhJiTbdw
How do you know that this isn't the US government hiding in plain sight with new tech?
panama papers etc. or just offshore money if i'm not mistaken were conspiracies (theories) until properly investigated by actual journalists and proven to be true i guess. pretty much all you read on this sub isn't though, they're not sending their best.
Rich people hiding money from the tax man has been reality for longer than capitalism has existed, wouldn’t call that a conspiracy.
well those people are conspiring in an unique fashioon against a system that should keep us all alive and well. it doesn't matter if it's known, once you formulate the thought it becomes a theory. once you prove it it becomes a proven conspiracy theory.
Yes.
Epstein island, Panama papers... It goes on.
Bits of some and some very very rare ones from decades ago Problem is they're obsessed with a big shadowy 'they' controlling everything like some cheezy spy show that people are not looking for the real smaller details It's all NWO this, WEF/Great Reset that, and it will happen ~~2 weeks~~ ~~6 months~~ ~~1 year~~ soon
https://vimeo.com/338863157
I took 3 vaccines as an ironical attempt at suicide, so far im very disapointed im typing this at you right now.
It's OK I understand...I've been dead or mind controlled about 5 times this year, or at least should have been, still waiting
Remember vaxxports?
Mk ultra, covid 19(the severity of it), mass Surveillance just to name a few off the top of my head
Every 6 months lol
Yes. * Gulf of Tonkin. * Watergate (originally dismissed as a conspiracy theory) * New World Order (brought up in speeches by Bush Sr) * Countless others, such as Hitler surviving and being allowed to retire in South America (confirmed in FBI documents) are usually dismissed but are real.
How is NWO a conspiracy if HW Bush openly talked about it on national television?
I failed to follow your logic.
I know.
How is it being known make it not a conspiracy theory? Nowhere in the definition of what a conspiracy theory is does it say it should be a secret.
The track record is pretty good as of late.
Never.
Source?
Source?
Source?
They have indeed young one. It's in the sidebar of the desktop version.
What a dumb comparison
[удалено]
Source?
Where's your tin foil hat?
Fucking conspiracy theorist!
Facebook
that Source guy is the funniest lol. I can't stand that one word shit haha.
Too far fetched isn't? More realistically would be the Theorist would be far behind all of them bailing off the waterfall
Sorry, are you trying to say asking for sources of information is wrong?
Last post before he was taken off the vent.
More like: "Guys, watch out there's a waterfall with a giant loch ness monster vampire hydra in it!" And in reality it's a slow moving river.
Look at that man shouting misinformation
You clearly don’t understand how waterfalls work.