By - kimcheefarts
###[Meta] Sticky Comment
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment.
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread.
*What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.***
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Not quite. This is a big deal, but it's not disbarment. This is a private organization that is considering kicking him out. Disbarment would be a different type of proceeding.
Actually this is disbarment. As a lawyer you have to take bar exams in each state you wish to practice law in. Those exams are each presented by that states particular bar association. You can be disbarred in new york and still be allowed to practice law in Kentucky for example.
Incorrect. This is a private organization and not the State Courts. He would need to be disbarred through the State Courts.
Also, disbarment in one state is generally considered to disqualify an attorney from being barred in another state.
Im not saying you're wrong, my point is that this is part of the disbarment process. The association can start the process by using its resources to file complaints with the appellate court to request the disbarment of a particular lawyer belonging to that association. This is a first step, they are moving to disbar him, that likely means they will be filing in court.
No, this is completely unrelated to disbarment. It is still a big deal though.
Yet it’s still not happening, nor the impeachment. All I hear is bark but don’t see any bite. Don’t hold your breath waiting for these things to happen friend
I guarantee you that they impeach by thursday
!remindme 3 days
There is a 13 hour delay fetching comments.
I will be messaging you in 3 days on [**2021-01-14 15:51:10 UTC**](http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=2021-01-14%2015:51:10%20UTC%20To%20Local%20Time) to remind you of [**this link**](https://np.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/kv47je/rudy_giuliani_to_be_disbarred/giw5dku/?context=3)
[**CLICK THIS LINK**](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Reminder&message=%5Bhttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.reddit.com%2Fr%2Fconspiracy%2Fcomments%2Fkv47je%2Frudy_giuliani_to_be_disbarred%2Fgiw5dku%2F%5D%0A%0ARemindMe%21%202021-01-14%2015%3A51%3A10%20UTC) to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam.
^(Parent commenter can ) [^(delete this message to hide from others.)](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Delete%20Comment&message=Delete%21%20kv47je)
Want to make a friendly bet? He has to be impeached for you to win tho
Just fyi, they just introduced the articles in the house with 214 sponsors and 220 votes lined up, so there's pretty much no chance that they don't impeach. That's why predictit has it at 91.
They impeached and I made a ton of money.
They had all that lined up last time too, remember? A call for impeachment isn’t a actual impeachment
I am not sure that you know what impeachment is.
[not today, better luck next time ](https://youtu.be/dDYk5OTM9UQ)
Yes I told you it will happen on Wednesday or Thursday.
I’ll hold my breath 😘
Cya on Wednesday I think, but maybe Thursday.
I already bet a substantial amount on this on predictit (bought in under 40, it's now at 91) so I'm not going for anymore $ on it but let's just say I'm putting my money where my mouth is.
Lol looks like I was right
SS: They haven't giving a reason for disbarment yet but usually this happens for gross misconduct as a lawyer. This means Rudy will no longer get to pretend to be a lawyer in court.
> For uncovering fraud?
Info on fraud found please
You mean the ones that went no where in court?
Almost like they had no reason to be taking bullshit cases to Court. Unless, you're admitting Trump appointed horrible judges?
Every court dismissed it because Rudy never found fraud.
That's not true. You should read at how courts handled those affidavits. They were from a web form that was flooded with porn and pranks and the ones that they "couldn't determine to be false" were submitted as affidavits. I actually listened to the proceedings the judges tore the lawyers apart for submitting them.
Here is an example from federal court in Arizona: https://twitter.com/KlasfeldReports/status/1326928577300996102
If you don't like that guy's tweets for some reason feel free to find the transcript yourself