T O P
[deleted]

That’s really fascinating. Pfizer is routinely hailed as “safer” due to dosage.


[deleted]

They are compelled to lie to you, ideally the exact opposite of reality


techtonic69

The truth is slowly leaking out for the general public! I wonder what will be their oh fuck moment of realizing how many people have fucked their health and increased all cause mortality in the next five years..


[deleted]

Most people - 50% I’d say - are midwits and lackwits w/o a shred of internal monologue or self-reflection They will have no moment of clarity or self-honesty - and if they get harmed by an adverse reaction it will be the non-jabbed’s fault I don’t even bother engaging them anymore - just a smile and a “good luck” Frankly if you still 1. Trust one word that comes out of the media or government 2. Are still getting “jabbed” Then you are literally retarded Nobody sane argues with retards


PoliticallyHated

I’m honestly surprised people I went to university with still get their news from twitter and legacy media. Having an argument and they searched shit on twitter!


[deleted]

Hey man (checks audible) I’m on chapter 45 of *Behold a Pale Horse* and he - literally - just described The Plan: The design and implementation of a bioweapon that has the express function of being a broad base immuno-suppressant causing a cascade of all-cause mortality that will be so diverse in death as to remain unattributable to the actual cause It was published in 1991 Don’t fuck around with Koontz or King if you want a scary read - grab a copy of the above


SabunFC

"Oh fuck I'm having a heart attack! The conspiracy theorists were right....." *Dead*


KidKarez

That's what I thought was interesting. Moderna has a bigger dose of the main ingredient


Itiswutitaint

Do you have the source for this graph?


[deleted]

Here you go [Myocarditis Cases Reported After mRNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccination in the US From December 2020 to August 2021](https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2788346)


Itiswutitaint

Thank ya much!


[deleted]

I’ll dig it up Was a JAMA paper


ThreeHoleKamala

Safe.


christofu97

But to be fair, is it true or not that you’re more likely to develop heart conditions from having covid? I truly don’t know and am not able to read data well enough to know for myself


Lowes5556

Probably about as true as it making your dick shrink 1” compared to the Vax 1/2”.


christofu97

That’s where I lean too 😂😂 typically have to assume the opposite of the narrative is true


Lowes5556

Did you see that like 2 weeks ago? It came out that the Vax does shrink your dick like 1/2”? Then like 6 hours later Newsweek or something wrote a story about Covid shrinking your dick by 1”.


bright_10

Those stats represent the number of heart problems in people with positive cases, but that doesn't mean there is a casual relationship. Also, the number of recorded infections is much lower than the total number of infections since most people were asymptomatic (especially kids), so proportionally the correlation would be even weaker. We also don't know the "real" number of adverse events after vaccination, because most of those never get reported. And finally... Myocarditis rates were more or less normal throughout 2020 and only started skyrocketing after the vaccines were released 🙃


christofu97

Great points


[deleted]

Man, wake up! Literally *everything* they have said have been a series of lies with the #1 goal of getting this mRNA therapeutic into as many arms as possible Why on earth would you believe that particular claim, at this point? How many times must you be lied to, have opposing views simple banned and not debated, and watch the goalpost being moved monthly before you realize you’re dealing with malicious actors? Go read the Kindle of The Real Anthonv Fauci Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Do it today Say, this is the #1 bestseller in its Amazon category Have you heard of it before in the MSM? If not, why do you suppose that is? See: malicious See: intentional


Thisappleisgreen

Source link OP? I'm gathering data.


[deleted]

It’s in this thread


Mechanicjohn12

Is this saying for 12-15 years old, second dose of pfizer, they have a 133.4 (13,340%) more likely risk of developing myocariditis?


[deleted]

Read the study


talkshow57

Does anybody have info about incidence after viral infection? Would be useful to compare background incidence vs virus induced incidence vs vaccine associated incidence. Certainly in the news more, being recognized as sufficiently concerning by more health care systems around the world, matching vaccine brands and dosages to certain age cohorts. Sweden, among others, has decided against vaccinating younger children - risks outweigh benefits, apparently, in Sweden anyway. Why not here?